Title: Organizational Ethnography and Methodological Angst: Myths and Challenges in the Field
Author: Dvora Yanow
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the myths and challenges in the field of organizational ethnography and methodological angst.
Design/methodology/approach – This paper is initially written as an invited keynote address for the 3rd Annual Joint Symposium on “Current Developments in Ethnographic Research in the Social and Management Sciences” (University of Liverpool Management School and Keele University Institute for Public Policy and Management, Liverpool, September 3-5, 2008). It explores what might be distinctive about organizational ethnography and how that might be different from “anthropological” ethnography. In particular, it engages a kind of collective methodological performance anxiety among organizational studies scholars without formal training in anthropology who do ethnographic research.
Findings – The paper argues that it is time to be explicit about a variety of forms of professional angst that many ethnographic researchers within organizational studies carry which have not been discussed.
Originality/value – The paper is of value to those willing to consider the myths and challenges that need engaging and perhaps uprooting and casting off.
The South African Centre for Group Research
“Our vision is to enable South African leaders to understand and work with groups.”
Free Access to Journals in April
“As a member of the Editorial Team for Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society we wanted you to be aware of this promotion, as it is a great way of introducing the journal…”
Brain Sciences Special Issue: The Brain Knows More than it Admits
“Brain Sciences is published in open access format—research articles, reviews and other contents are released on the Internet immediately after acceptance. The scientific community and the general public have unlimited free access to the content as soon as it is published.”