Diversity and Dissent in the Social Sciences
Title: Diversity and Dissent in the Social Sciences: The Case of Organization Studies
Author: Kristina Rolin
Abstract: I introduce a case study from organization studies to argue that social epistemologists’ recommendation to cultivate diversity and dissent in science is unlikely to be welcomed in the social sciences unless it is coupled with another epistemic ideal: the norm of epistemic responsibility. The norm of epistemic responsibility enables me to show that organization scholars’ concern with the fragmentation of their discipline is generated by false assumptions: the assumption that a diversity of theoretical approaches will lead to fragmentation and the assumption that an imposed consensus on a theoretical approach is needed to maintain the unity of the discipline.
Organizational Change Certificate Course Offerings 2013-2014
“This certificate is ideal for students interested in leadership in organizations, research in organizations, and consulting in organizations.”
The Perverse Panopticon in Forensic Mental Health
“…the very real power differentials that exist between the ‘would be watcher’ and ‘won’t be watched’. This gives rise to the disturbed and disturbing claustrophobic environment that we are calling the perverse panopticon within which this more conscious, and intentional reciprocal scrutiny becomes suffused with more primitive forms of unconscious communication rooted in processes of projective and introjective identification…”