Diversity and Dissent in the Social Sciences
Title: Diversity and Dissent in the Social Sciences: The Case of Organization Studies
Author: Kristina Rolin
Abstract: I introduce a case study from organization studies to argue that social epistemologists’ recommendation to cultivate diversity and dissent in science is unlikely to be welcomed in the social sciences unless it is coupled with another epistemic ideal: the norm of epistemic responsibility. The norm of epistemic responsibility enables me to show that organization scholars’ concern with the fragmentation of their discipline is generated by false assumptions: the assumption that a diversity of theoretical approaches will lead to fragmentation and the assumption that an imposed consensus on a theoretical approach is needed to maintain the unity of the discipline.
“…leadership per se could be said to have achieved an almost “bling-like” resonance within the business world. Indeed leaders tend to be presented – falsely – as the heroes and saviours…”
Emotions in the Learning Organization
“Edward Hess on role of emotions in the learning organization.”
Committed to Ineffective Strategies?
“Organizational blind spots arise when leadership and/or operational members in organizations are unable to acknowledge unworkable strategies.”